CARESS Working Paper 99 - 03 A Bayesian Approach to Uncertainty Aversion 1 Yoram Halevy

نویسنده

  • Yoram Halevy
چکیده

The Ellsberg paradox demonstrates that people’s belief over uncertain events might not be representable by subjective probability. We relate this paradox to other commonly observed anomalies, such as a rejection of the backward induction prediction in the one-shot Ultimatum Game. We argue that the pattern common to these observations is that the behavior is governed by “rational rules”. These rules have evolved and are optimal within the repeated and concurrent environments that people usually encounter. When an individual relies on these rules to analyze one-shot or single circumstances, paradoxes emerge. We show that when a risk averse individual has a Bayesian prior and uses a rule which is optimal for simultaneous and positively correlated ambiguous risks to evaluate a single vague circumstance, his behavior will exhibit uncertainty aversion. Thus, the behavior predicted by Ellsberg may be explained within the Bayesian expected utility paradigm. JEL classi...cation: D81

منابع مشابه

A Bayesian Approach to Uncertainty Aversion

The Ellsberg paradox demonstrates that people’s belief over uncertain events might not be representable by subjective probability. We argue that Uncertainty Aversion may be viewed as a case of “Rule Rationality”. This paradigm claims that people’s decision making has evolved to simple rules that perform well in most regular environments. Such an environment consists of replicas of some basic si...

متن کامل

CARESS Working Paper 98-03 Trade Between Rational Agents as a Result of Asymmetric Information

\No Trade" Theorems claim that the mere arrival of new information can not induce trade between rational agents, even in the presence of asymmetric information. We analyze an economy in which the information agents receive is without noise. As long as preferences abide by the Sure Thing Principle, the no-trade result holds. However, under more general preferences, which do not satisfy the Sure ...

متن کامل

The Rich Domain of Risk

We report on two experiments challenging the common assumption that events with objective probabilities constitute a unique source of uncertainty. We …nd that, similar to the domain of ambiguity (Abdellaoui et al. 2011), the domain of risk is rich in the sense that behavior is systematically di¤erent when subjects face risky bets based on simple or more complex events. Further, we …nd a tight a...

متن کامل

Ellsberg Revisited: an Experimental Study

Ellsberg’s experiment is extended to study the association between ambiguity aversion and violation of reduction of compound lotteries. It is shown that the two phenomena are strongly associated. Further analysis reveals two di¤erent forms of association, which correspond to alternative theoretical models that account for ambiguity attitudes. JEL Classi…cation: D81, C91.

متن کامل

Calibration without reduction for non-expected utility

Evidence from the lab and the field shows that most people exhibit substantial risk aversion over stakes of hundreds of dollars. Expected utility cannot capture nonnegligible risk aversion over such small stakes without producing implausible risk aversion over large stakes, and under the reduction of compound lotteries axiom, neither can nonexpected utility preferences. Motivated by experimenta...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

متن کامل
عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1999